Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Thanksgiving

We're back from a follow-up visit to Mayo, with little news to report, which is a good thing--the monsters, while still present, have not yet reawakened. I am feeling good, and have enough hair to have resumed using shampoo. That I take pleasure in this surprises me, but it is what it is. The hair is surprisingly helpful as an insulator, and I am gradually finding myself less in need of extra layers of insulation even though the temperature keeps dropping.

I'm now on long term disability, trying to figure out how to keep being useful and productive, while also trying to figure out how to balance my desire to keep being productive against my wish to enjoy as much as possible of my limited remaining time on earth.

The main point of the visit to Rochester was to plan the post-transplant "consolidation" chemotherapy.

Forgive me for getting slightly technical here, but just in case anyone else can ever use the information, I do want to record the plan we arrived at and the reasoning. A consistent theme from clinical trials is that patients like me with 17p deletions respond better to the class of drugs called proteasome inhibitors (Velcade, Kyprolis, Ninlaro) than to other classes of  drugs used to treat myeloma. So we want one of those, along with dexamethasone, which is both dirt cheap and the best single drug for knocking down the category of cells (lymphocytes) from which the tumors originate. The effect is much broader than you might hope for, and the side effects are unpleasant, but umpteen clinical trials have shown dexamethasone to be better than any known alternative. The last drug in the regimen is called lenolinamide, which goes by the brand name Revlimid. It's a close relative of thalidomide, the drug that got famous for causing horrific birth defects in the 1950s. Its action as an anticancer agent is not totally clear, but it has a great track record in myeloma, and has been responsible for a major improvement in survival. However, it's not as clear that it works well for patients like me.

Last year, a handful of new myeloma drugs were approved by the FDA. Among them were one proteasome inhibitor (Ninlaro), and two monoclonal antibodies (Darzalex and Empliciti). Because they're newly approved, and patented, and this is the U.S.A., they are all wildly expensive. Revlimid, Kyprolis, and Velcade are also wildly expensive, by which I mean a year's supply of any of those drugs will run between $100,000 and $300,000 per year, if your insurance company won't cover them.

And there's one more consideration. Revlimid and dexamethasone are tablets. All you have to do is swallow them. Almost all the rest are delivered by infusion, which means that you go to your local hematology/oncology clinic and hang out for an hour or two while an IV is delivered into the increasingly less willing veins in one or the other arm. If you've had any recent contact with your local health care providers, you will realize that "an hour or two" in the infusion room means a minimum of three hours of real time. Velcade can be delivered by subutaneous injection, which takes less time, but still requires showing up for an hour or two, and leaves ugly red welts all over your belly.

Darzalex may well be a wonder drug, and I definitely expect to make use of it. But it is not a cure, so it makes sense to put off its use until what I'm doing doesn't work anymore. Meanwhile, Ninlaro is a proteasome inhibitor, to which I'm likely to respond well, but I can take it orally, so I will not be tied to an infusion center for hours on end. So we're going with Ninlaro/Revlimid/dexamethasone. It's not a cure, but then again nothing is. And we'll probably need to change it out after a year or so.

Apologies to all for whom that was too much. May we all survive the next four years.

Thursday, November 3, 2016

Benchmarks

There hasn't been much to report since we've returned to Louisville, and I have dutifully failed to report. Liz and I have been taking care of business old and new, between filing insurance claims, re-establishing our relationship with the US Postal Service, obsessively checking presidential poll aggregators, and so forth.

The weather has been spectacularly good here, and I became strangely obsessed with rehabbing some outdoor furniture we brought here from Salt Lake that had been sadly ignored. It got a few days of attention, and looks a little better, anyway. I've been working on the bike and feeling better, although I do need to lie down for a while after a ride.

And there has been baseball. I grew up a Phillies fan (it used to be a congenital condition, as no one with any sense would adopt them as a favorite), back when they were still working off the 77 year-long interval before winning their first World Series. When I was in grad school, living in Chicago, it was fun to play hooky on the occasional summer afternoon and take the el down to Wrigley. This was a few years before they put lights in, so all the games were afternoon games. The bleacher seats were $2, the beer was cheaper than that, and a few of my heroes from the 1980 Phillies had been traded to the Cubs. I'll spare you any further details, but it was easy to fall in love with Cubs, especially in 1984. Never mind what happened then. Or that other thing.

So I do have to say: Cubs win! Cubs win! And attribute it to Jack Brickhouse, although it may go back further. He was gone by '84, but a bit easier to take than Harry Caray while I was trying to comprehend the finer points of principal components analysis.

I'm thinking that I will make it a goal to be alive for the next time the Cubs win the World Series. On second thought, that might be setting the bar a little low, since those guys could do again next year. Maybe the Phillies, then. That's definitely a reach.